Supreme Court Weighs City Climate Suits Against Oil Companies

The U.S. Supreme Court opened its new term by taking up a high-stakes legal dispute that could determine whether local governments across the country have the right to hold major oil companies financially responsible for damages tied to climate change.

The case places the justices at the center of a long-running national debate over who bears legal and financial liability for the consequences of rising seas, intensifying storms, and other climate-related harms that municipalities argue have cost them billions of dollars in infrastructure and emergency response.

Read more Trump Orders Dyed Diesel Access Extended to Nonfarm Vehicles →

At the core of the dispute is a fundamental question of jurisdiction: whether such climate liability claims belong in state courts, where local governments have generally chosen to file them, or whether they must be heard in federal court, a venue that has historically proven less favorable to plaintiffs pursuing this type of litigation against the energy industry.

Oil companies have argued that federal law should govern any such claims, given the interstate and international nature of greenhouse gas emissions, while local government plaintiffs contend that state nuisance and consumer protection laws provide an appropriate legal foundation for holding fossil fuel producers accountable.

The court's ultimate ruling could have sweeping consequences for dozens of similar lawsuits filed by cities and states nationwide, as well as for the broader question of how American courts will engage with climate-related legal accountability in the years ahead. Continue reading at NYT > Business